National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) finds information on “Suthin Chidchob” in connection with consignment of merchandise at Songkhro shops.


NACC, NACC points out criminal and disciplinary grounds for “Suthin Chidchob”, former commander of Prachuap Prison, and his associates who set up a group of housewives to sell food and drinks in the prison.

Miss Jutharat Yellow Permsakul Director of the NACC Office, Prachuap Khiri Khan Province, revealed that from the investigation, it was found that between July 2014 and September 29, 2015, Mr. Suthin Chidchob, when he held the position of Provincial Prison Commander. Prachuap Khiri Khan There was an order to establish the Prachuap Khiri Khan Province Prison Housewives Club. Even though during that period there were no rules or regulations issued regarding the establishment of the Prison Housewives Club. and allowed the Prachuap Khiri Khan Province Prison Housewives Club Produce products to be consigned to sell in prison welfare shops. without specifying the quantity of products and there is no law to support this. And there is no discount not exceeding 8 percent of the products sold. Enter the income of t
he prisoner welfare shop. which is government income from the Prachuap Khiri Khan Prison Housewives Club. Accused No. 5 is the sole person who manages all income and expenses. Profits have never been shared with those whose names appear in the Prachuap Khiri Khan Prison Housewives Club. Including those named to join the Prachuap Khiri Khan Province Prison Housewives Club. They did not know about the expenses or business results of the club in any way, so they operated it themselves under the name of the Prachuap Khiri Khan Prison Housewives Club. and use the proceeds from product sales for personal benefit

Ms. Jutharat said that the NACC considered and resolved that Mr. Suthin’s actions There is a criminal basis for being an official. Has a duty to buy, make, manage or maintain any property. Using power in position dishonestly which causes damage to the state, municipality, sanitation department or the owner of that property and on the basis of being an official who performed or neglected to perform his duti
es illegally According to the Criminal Code, Section 151, Section 152 and Section 157, together with Section 91, Section 172 of the NACC Act, together with the Criminal Code, Section 91 and the grounds for serious disciplinary offenses according to the Civil Service Act. 2018

As for the actions of Ms. Siriporn Ariyasatham, or not least the 2nd accused, Ms. Sanittra Pimnuansri, the 4th accused, from the preliminary investigation. The facts and evidence are not sufficient to establish that Has committed a criminal offense as accused The criminal charges are baseless. Let the accusation be dropped. But there is a basis for a non-serious disciplinary offense.

As for the actions of Ms. Paweena Santaruthaikul, accused no. 5, there were criminal grounds. The base is a supporter of officials. Has a duty to buy, make, manage or maintain any property. Using power in position dishonestly which causes damage to the state, municipality, sanitation department or the owner of that property As for Mr. Sakarin Chuenaam, acc
used no. 3, the meeting considered. There was a unanimous resolution with 5 votes that from the preliminary investigation The facts and evidence are not sufficient to establish that has committed a criminal offense The criminal charges are baseless. Let the accusation be dropped. But Mr. Sakarin He has a position as the manager of the prison welfare shop for prisoners in Prachuap Khiri Khan Province. It is responsible for managing the said store. Including the disbursement of money from prison welfare shops. It is also responsible for taking care of the income from product sales. Do not deduct discounts from Ms. Paweena’s products, not exceeding 8 percent of the products sold as government income. Therefore, there is a basis for a non-serious disciplinary offense.

By sending a report Proceedings of the inquiry documentary evidence electronic copy and the decision will be sent to the Attorney General To prosecute criminal cases in court which has jurisdiction to consider and adjudicate the case against Mr. Su
thin and Ms. Paweena and submit a report and investigation documents documentary evidence and decision to the commander To take disciplinary action against Mr. Suthin, Mrs. Siriporn, Mr. Sakarin and Ms. Sanittra. According to the said offense according to the NACC Act, Sections 91 (1) and (2) and Section 98, as the case may be. and inform Prachuap Khiri Khan Provincial Prison Carry out duties and authority to provide compensation for damages.

Source: Thai News Agency