"Phrompong" points out that "Gen. Prawit" returning salary will not help him escape ethical and legal violations because the offense has already been completed. He urges him to resign. Mr. Prompong Noppharit, former spokesman of the Pheu Thai Party, spoke about the case of General Prawit Wongsuwan, MP for the party list and leader of the Palang Pracharath Party, who ordered Mr. Paiboon Nititawan, secretary-general of the Palang Pracharath Party, Pol. Lt. Gen. Piya Tawichai, party spokesman, and Mr. Thirachai Phuvanatnaranubala, former Minister of Finance, and his team to hold a press conference on the return of MP salaries, saying that it was likely an excuse to come out and confess that they had done wrong, but it was just water, no substance, like Khanom Jeen with only noodles and no sauce. He also saw the unpreparedness of the Palang Pracharath Party's work, which was unable to find any MPs to speak for the party, but instead had people outside the parliament come to scrutinize the government, instead of the duty of the Palang Pracharath Party's MPs. Therefore, it is clear that today, the Palang Pracharath Party no longer has any MPs left to protect General Prawit. Mr. Phromphong said that in the case of Mr. Paiboon coming out to give a press conference to accept that he would recommend that General Prawit travel to perform his duties in the parliament more, it is equivalent to Mr. Paiboon accepting that the parliament meetings every Wednesday and Thursday are the duty of General Prawit, who is a party-list MP and a representative of the Thai people. He must devote his time to performing his duties. The House of Representatives has held 97 meetings. General Prawit has been absent from meetings using leave as a cover for almost 90% of the days that the parliament is in session, regardless of the social trend that calls for responsibility. When General Prawit has no political responsibility by resigning as requested, but chooses to not receive his salary and notify his intention to return his salary instead of performing his duties as a representative of the Thai people, choosing to return his salary or choosing to forfeit his salary after being absent from meetings and being sued for ethics by the parliament and the NACC does not make the action that is considered a crime complete and not a crime. Is it a shallow legal trick that Mr. Paiboon and his legal team are giving advice on? It is like making excuses to muddy the water. But in this case, I think General Prawit will definitely get a 'sniper'. If I were to give advice to General Prawit, I would tell General Prawit that 'the worth of a person depends on the results of his work.' There will be more dignity and elegance like a military man than returning the money after the crime has been committed. Therefore, I would like to suggest that 'you resign' because there is still one more candidate for prime minister. Mr. Phromphong mentioned the case of Mr. Paiboon calling for MPs who frequently take leave to follow General Prawit, saying that it was creating a new unethical tradition. It made him even more surprised that Mr. Paiboon, as the party secretary and the person in charge of the party regulations, did not call for representatives to devote time to performing their duties, but instead called for General Prawit to be an example. He was not surprised that it was time for General Prawit to have a problem or end the game because no one close to him who advised on this matter in this parliament had behaved like General Prawit. If Mr. Paiboon could only think this much, he would like to propose that General Prawit remove Mr. Paiboon from his position because, judging from the press conference, he failed in many matters, including the accusation that he was a member of a political party and accepted a job from a political party leader to complain to General Prawit, when in fact he was not a member of any political party, did not accept a job from a political party leader, or was hired by anyone to complain to General Prawit. He would like to say that he accepted the j ob from the people because the taxpaying people complained to him. Therefore, he had to perform his duty for the public benefit and the benefit of the country and the people informed him when Mr. Paiboon asked him to fully investigate General Prawit. I will soon submit an additional investigation of General Prawit at the NACC office for his actions that violate the law and NACC regulations, different acts and different terms, punishable by imprisonment and a fine for disqualification from politics, and unethical behavior, in addition to what I have already submitted. 'The behavior of the offense is likely to be that of a wealthy villager who goes on a luxury tour and lives comfortably,' said Mr. Phromphong. For the case where Pol. Lt. Gen. Piya, the party spokesman, and Mr. Thirachai came out to give a press conference about the price of fuel or the Vayuphak Fund, I would like to suggest that Gen. Prawit, the party leader, arrange for MPs from the Palang Pracharath Party to come and ask questions to the Min ister of Finance or the responsible minister in the parliament. This will make the Palang Pracharath Party the true opposition. Having Mr. Thirachai come out to investigate economic issues seems like a mistake, like a broken record, and should act more as a party of vengeance than an opposition. Mr. Thirachai is not an MP. If the Palang Pracharath Party is ready, and the MPs are still in the party, and he has not fled the party, Mr. Thirachai should provide information to the MPs to come and ask questions in the parliament. Or should General Prawit go and ask questions in the parliament himself? Will he dare or not? Mr. Phromphong insisted that the various investigations to create transparency are good and the public benefits. But for him, 'the truth never dies.' General Prawit really did miss the meeting, claiming to have other duties, and really took leave from the meeting. Until today, he came out to confess by returning his salary and forfeiting it, but he still does not feel like dedicating his time to perform his duties. On October 3, he still took leave from the meeting. Therefore, he cannot stop investigating General Prawit's performance until General Prawit takes political responsibility. In the end, General Prawit will definitely take legal responsibility. Source: Thai News Agency