“Phumitham” awaiting the Constitutional Court’s decision Before announcing the face of the new government Vos had enough support to counter “go far” on Section 112. It had always made it clear that they did not want Will you raise your hand and vote for it or not? Considered a privilege, do not want to pressure if not vote for us at all. We speak in polite terms. Ready to reiterate that “Thaksin” to return home has not changed. waiting for the family to clarify
August 3, 2023, Mr. Phumtham Wechayachai, Deputy Leader of the Pheu Thai Party Mentioning the postponement of the government establishment statement that the Constitutional Court accepted the Ombudsman’s request to decide on the nomination of Mr. Phitha Lim Chareonrat Can it be repeated? The court asked for more details. And will be postponed for consideration on August 16, so coordinated with the President of the National Assembly and got an answer saying must wait to hear the decision of the Constitutional Court first Therefore, the prime minister’s voting agenda had to be postponed. But it is expected that within a week after August 16, there should be a vote for the Prime Minister, so when the vote is postponed Everything shouldn’t be doing much. should wait for clarification from the Constitutional Court first
As for many parties who are afraid that the voices will not be enough, I would like to confirm that the voices we have are sufficient to form a government. But when the meeting was postponed I have more time to work. because seeking cooperation from all parties The more you get, the better. Waiting for the Constitutional Court to decide and chairman of the council set the agenda We are ready to press a press conference to join the government.
When asked if the collected voices were enough to reveal whether there were any parties, Mr. Phumtham said that it would be good to wait a bit longer. but admitted that there were a fair number of votes from the original 8 parties And there are a number of votes from the original 188-party coalition government. And there must be another senator because we are under the crisis of the current constitution. which stipulates that more than 375 votes must be obtained from members of the House of Representatives We want it to be as stable and as strong as possible. Because having a vote for the House of Representatives will lead to a stable and efficient government. Including setting the direction of work Able to manage all work directions more clearly And still have to add a number of senators. which we want more in order to see that We are a government that can come in and recover from the crisis. under the cooperation of all parties which will cause the conflict to resolve
Asked if now there are news reports that none of the two uncles have joined the government, Mr. Phumtham said waiting for a clear decision on what is what. Today we try to seek cooperation. But we know there are limits. And there are still issues that are the problems of the people. We have to take these things into account as well.
When asked if the senators’ votes were not counted, would they need to find more MPs? but seeking cooperation demonstrating consensus on forming a government
Mr. Phumitham also clarified the case of the Kao Klai Party stating that He did not reconcile the vote from the far-reaching party. confirm is not true He has already clarified that This separation, when we terminate the MOU, assume that all parties are independent of each other. As for the Progressive Party, will vote or not vote? It is a privilege. The important thing is that we want to create a new political dimension. We and the Progressive Party are able to do political work that benefits the people. Therefore, what is beneficial to the people and the country? We are happy to support There is no need to stand on the opposition side, the government side and oppose each other all the time. He also gave an example of amending the constitution that it is something that we all want to solve. to unlock the country’s problems I am ready to support And you need to support it too. because it is thought to be a common factor on the national agenda have to do together As for the laws agreed in the MOU that match the policies of the Pheu Thai Party or other laws which is not mentioned in the MOU, we are happy to support But the problem that we definitely don’t want is Section 112 Because we refused since the first MOU that we did not sign, but when the second MOU was filled in again We already said that We are not comfortable signing. because we disagree and confirmed that If there is a story about Section 112, we don’t vote for it. But if it’s something else that’s good, we’ll vote for it, so we say this decision. If you vote for us We are grateful. But if you don’t vote We don’t hold grudges against anyone. regarded as exclusive All said like this The matter at the meeting was Mr. Chaitawat Tulathon, secretary of the Kao Klai Party. Ms. Sirikanya Tansakul, Mr. Picharn Chaowpattanawong, Deputy Leader of the Kao Klai Party All confirmed what they could say. This is a fact. Sirikanya Tansakul, Mr. Phicharn Chaowpattanawong, Deputy Leader of the Kao Klai Party All confirmed what they could say. This is a fact. Sirikanya Tansakul, Mr. Phicharn Chaowpattanawong, Deputy Leader of the Kao Klai Party All confirmed what they could say. This is a fact. Sirikanya Tansakul, Mr. Phicharn Chaowpattanawong, Deputy Leader of the Kao Klai Party All confirmed what they could say. This is a fact. Sirikanya Tansakul, Mr. Phicharn Chaowpattanawong, Deputy Leader of the Kao Klai Party All confirmed what they could say. This is a fact.
As for Mr. Chaitawat, he stated that the Pheu Thai Party had never told the party to go far, back away from Section 112, and had to tear up the MOU, confirming that it was not true. have a misunderstanding Before emphasizing that in the first MOU, we are clear that if there is Article 112, we do not sign it and reserve the right not to participate in that MOU, so it has been withdrawn. we reject We have always expressed our stance with the Progressive Party clearly that Article 112 we do not agree to sign. As for solving anything, let’s do it. It is the privilege of each party. This one we speak to each other clearly. On the other hand, the Pheu Thai Party received the wood from the Kao Klai Party. spoke to many political parties In which everyone emphasized that if there was no signing of Section 112, which had informed the party that it was far away What is the opinion of each party? But if you go far away, still reply and confirm that the amendment to Section 112 is not the point. Because without Section 112, there are other issues.
When asked about the case of the Kao Klai Party, he said that the Pheu Thai Party was concerned. If the party moves far, vote for Some senators may be uncomfortable. Mr. Phumtham said that we had already said that if we voted for us, we would be grateful and pleased. But if you don’t vote for it, it’s okay. considered exclusive because now we are conducting a campaign Don’t think we’re going to put pressure on you. If you don’t vote for us at all. It is something that we have to go and seek cooperation. It is said in polite terms. and do not put pressure on each other It is the right to increase or decrease the points for us. Speak honestly, clearly, with nothing hidden.
when asked if the Progressive Party did not vote in support We will mainly seek votes from the coalition parties and senators, right? The country must be in harmony, so it’s good to listen to the ideas of all political parties, all groups. And if it’s a government that comes from accepting various ideas It will increase work efficiency. But I didn’t say that I would take every party. It depends on which party will join together. Or society can understand and see which direction cooperation will be the answer.
When asked about the case of Mr. Chuwit Kamolwisit revealing that Mr. Srettha Thavisin’s land purchase tax evasion will affect the consideration of the prime ministerial candidate or not, Mr. Phumtham said it was a matter for Mr. Rattha related to the original company which is known to have been announced Therefore, Mr. Srettha and the Company had to clarify and understand. but for the Pheu Thai Party Seeing the details, we don’t think there is any problem. Everything is in accordance with the process and the law.
When asked about Thaksin Shinawatra’s return home schedule whether it was still on August 10 or not, Mr Phumtham said that nothing had changed at this time. But it’s a family thing. Has nothing to do with politics As for Thaksin and his family, how will they decide? It’s about you. But now as you know as far as everyone knows Still nothing has changed.
Source: Thai News Agency