Parliament, July 19 -“Senator Direkrit” states that “Pita” should not be nominated and throw the council together to vote, but if you have to vote, you already have it in mind. Received the decision of the Constitutional Court affecting the decision of the Senator. Fear of defamation against the Constitution.

Mr. Direkrit Jentrantham, member of the Senate (Senator) discussed the proposal to nominate Mr. Phitha. Lim Chareonrat Candidate Mr. Kritthamontri The far-reaching party in the 2nd round of voting for the Prime Minister said that when listening to the opinions and reasons of both parties, they could be heard. Because even the President of the National Assembly can’t decide. When there is a difference of opinion, a resolution must be made. While personal opinions and Senators themselves think that they cannot be repeated. should nominate another person If repeating the proposal, the meeting session should be omitted. As for the opinion that it can be repeated, let’s talk about it according to the resolution. whether to pass or not

As for the meeting of the judges of the Constitutional Court to consider the petition for Mr. Phitha’s shareholding today Mr. Direkrit said that fairness must be given to those nominated. having to wait for the court to make a decision But if the court accepts the request and orders to stop performing duties admit that it affects decision making because of the defamation of wrongdoing Presumptuously believing that one may be disqualified that someone suing for supporting an unqualified person would violate the constitution itself. But if it doesn’t fall into the court’s scope, the petition can be dismissed.

“How do I decide? Asked to look at the facts at the time of the vote, but there was already an opinion that was expected according to the law in voting.” Mr. Direkrit Said.-Thai News Agency

Source: Thai News Agency