“Wissanu” brushed off the corner of the law in the case of “Pita”

“Wissanu” reveals the case against Chanchai media shares. can be compared to the case of “Pitha”, but the issues are different, there are many cases to compare with each other because there is no duty involved

Mr. Wissanu Krea-ngam, Deputy Prime Minister Giving an interview about Mr. Pita’s shareholding in ITV Lim Chareonrat far-reaching party leader If compared to other media shareholding cases that the Constitutional Court has already ruled that there are many cases, he has not yet looked at. But can’t tell which case it is. But it’s a case about shareholding.

When asked to reiterate that the case of Mr. Chanchai Issara Senarak, former MP Nakhon Nayok, Democrat Party comparable? Because in the case of Mr. Chanchai, the parent company holds shares in a subsidiary but have to take it all together

As for the case of Mr. Ruangkrai Leekitwatana, a former candidate for the list of MPs The Palang Pracharat Party took the court’s decision to submit as additional evidence enough to be able to compare or not. Mr. Wissanu said he had not yet seen what he submitted. And can’t tell which case to go to see because there are many cases that can be compared But you have to go and see for yourself. He has no duty to interfere with there.

Source: Thai News Agency