"Srisuwan" asks the NACC to investigate the ethics of "Kaoklai-Dr. Ong" for fraud and camouflage legal acts. Reason for expulsion from party Affects the elegance of performing duties of the Progressive Party - Doctor Ong Next week, prepare to submit more evidence to the NACC in the beer advertising case.

Mr. Srisuwan Charanya, leader of the Patriotic Love the Land organization Submit a letter to the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) conducted an investigation and had an opinion. In the case where the meeting of the Kaew Klai Party Executive Committee and Party MPs passed a resolution to remove Mr. Padipat Santipada, First Vice President of the House of Representatives, from being a member of the party. To be able to continue to serve as Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives and the Progressive Party to be able to hold the position of Leader of the Opposition in the House of Representatives. which saw that such action was considered fraud or a disguised legal act It is a serious violation of ethical standards according to Section 234 (1) of the Constitution. in conjunction with the NACC Act 2018. Moreover, such actions may contradict or contradict the ideology of the party that has previously registered with the Political Party Registrar to adhere to the rule of law. and human dignity clearly

Mr. Srisuwan stated that Mr. Padipat did not express his intention to resign. It is an important reason that the Kao Krai Party uses its power to expel Mr. Pradipat from membership in order to maintain his position as Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives and the party will have the right to be the leader of the opposition in the House of Representatives. which society criticizes a lot Because it is unusual for a party that has ever campaigned. that they will do politics like the new generation straightforward No need for any tricks. But the behavior of the Kaewkai Party and Mr. Padipat It is no different from the past political parties. Still in the sewage whirlpool that the villagers nicknamed it. And it might be a matter of trickery. Using resolutions to circumvent the law It may not be very accurate. And that kind of behavior could bring disrepute to the House of Representatives. for the positions of members of the House of Representatives and the Move Forward Party As a political party Although in such matters the law may not be within reach.

However, if one considers the Forward Party regulations that the Election Commission approved in 2020, it will be found that excluding names from party membership must violate party discipline. or against the party's ethics When looking at party regulations 119 and 121, they do not clearly specify such matters. and that Mr. Padipat Still retains the position of Vice President of the House of Representatives. It is not a serious breach of discipline. or is seriously unethical Therefore, the use of power by the Party Executive Committee and the Moving Forward Party MPs It should fall into the category of moral recovery. This is the ethical standard for people holding political positions. Therefore, the NACC is requested to conduct an investigation according to its authority and duties. If found to be in violation of the NACC, the matter must be sent to the Supreme Court for decision or sentencing.

When asked whether this case would affect the elegance of Mr. Padipat's duties as Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives, Mr. Srisuwan said that he believed it would be seriously affected and that he would likely be disrupted in performing his duties. in the House of Representatives Government Party MP or other parties The fortress has already stated that this matter will be handled honestly.

“About the elegance of the party that has come a long way in campaigning. What was said before would instantly disappear. This matter can become a matter. It may not be as bad as that of Doctor Ong and the Kao Klai Party,” Mr. Srisuwan said.

Mr. Srisuwan also said that next week he would bring additional evidence in the case of Mr. Padipat showing beer cans and alcoholic beverage advertisements to the NACC, which had previously submitted a matter for ethics review. This already by important evidence is that Mr. Padipat Go and confess to the fine committee. which is chaired by the Phitsanulok Provincial Public Health Office and received a fine of 50,000 baht, which was considered an admission of his own guilt He will submit evidence to the NACC to confirm that in the case of advertising alcoholic beverages it is clearly against the law. There is evidence to confirm. and is considered to have previously complained of an offense according to the Code of Ethics.

Source: Thai News Agency